On 4/2/2014 1:42 AM, Christopher Fynn wrote:
Rather than Emoji it might be better if people learnt Han ideographs
which are also compact (and a far more developed system of
communication than emoji). One CJK character can also easily replace
dozens of Latin characters - which is what is being claimed for emoji.
One wonders why the Japanese, who already know Han ideographs, took to
emoji as they did....
A./
On 02/04/2014, "Martin J. Dürst" <[email protected]> wrote:
Now that it's no longer April 1st (at least not here in Japan), I can
add a (moderately) serious comment.
On 2014/04/02 01:43, Ilya Zakharevich wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:01:39AM +0200, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
More emoji from Chrome:
http://chrome.blogspot.ch/2014/04/a-faster-mobiler-web-with-emoji.html
with video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3NXNnoGr3Y
I do not know… The demos leave me completely unimpressed: emoji — by
their nature — require higher resolution than text, so an emoji for
“pie” does not save any place comparing to the word itself. So the
impact of this on everyday English-languare communication would not be
in any way beneficial.
This is somewhat different for Japanese (and languages with similar
writing systems) because they have higher line height.
Regards, Martin.
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
_______________________________________________
Unicode mailing list
[email protected]
http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
