On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Per Starbäck <[email protected]>wrote:
> My question was *why* control characters don't > *have* names > That's because formally the ISO control codes do not have one fixed, normative meaning; implementers may or may not follow ISO 6429. That is why these don't have names in ISO 10646 and in Unicode. http://www.unicode.org/faq/casemap_charprop.html#15 Of course, a few control codes (e.g., U+000A) are very widely used, and have Unicode properties according to that use. (e.g., White_Space) markus
_______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
