> From: [email protected] (Per Starbäck) > Cc: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]>, "unicode\@unicode.org" <[email protected]> > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:37:57 +0100 > > This is not about Emacs. Emacs was an example of a program that has use > for character names, and has a harder job because of this strangeness. > Too bad that (Emacs developer) Eli Zaretskii sees it as a rant against > Emacs when I mention that this property of Unicode has led to > longstanding (small) bugs there, but I think real examples are better > than made-up ones.
What I saw as a rant is only this part (which was the only one I quoted): > > Emacs should do better regarding this "Should do better" means it still doesn't, although it's expected to. _______________________________________________ Unicode mailing list [email protected] http://unicode.org/mailman/listinfo/unicode
