On 30 May 2012 16:12, Andrew West <andrewcw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And (鱼芒) on page 4. > > But that is an unencoded simplified form of U+29DF6 𩷶
Oddly, the editors have created a new glyph for the unencoded simplified form of U+29DF6 𩷶, but have not done the same for U+9BA1 鮡 and U+9B88 鮈 (for which there are no corresponding encoded simplified forms), which they print using the traditional form characters. I suppose this is because they were unaware of the existence of U+29DF6 𩷶 (or did not have an appropriate font), and so had to create a glyph for the character anyway. Andrew
