On 31/08/15 16:31, Patrik Bubák wrote: > While that may be true, problem here is that if presented wrong, it might > give the user a bad impression. We want to avoid bad publicity, right? True, I think it was OMG who made up a logo for us once (and it was horrid), when we first announced Ubuntu GNOME becoming official, because we didn't have one at that point. > > These so called "news sites" don't have the proper resources atm. to spread > the word, so they shoot out an ugly screenshot they made > themselves and then people get the wrong first impression. I was more coming at it from the legal side, GNOME or Canonical Boards, are not going to go after us because some news site leaked stuff that is just a work in progress. However they will go after the news sites, if they feel the need. > > On Mon, 2015-08-31 at 16:27 +1000, Tim wrote: >> On 31/08/15 16:09, Ali/amjjawad wrote: >> > Again, OMG Ubuntu is 'not' the official source of information, at least >> > for Ubuntu GNOME and have zero authority to speak on our behalf. >> > >> > Just want to make sure everyone here knows this fact ;) >> to be honest I am suprised they didnt leak it earlier. But really what OMG >> and the other news sites do is not our problem, they are just after >> clicks to sell out on advertisements! >> > > -- > Sent using Evolution <https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Evolution/> from Ubuntu > <http://ubuntu.com/desktop> > > Nothing ruins creativity like too many voices weighing in. We call it the > /Ice Cream Principle/. Tell 10 people to go get ice cream with one > condition: they all have to agree on one flavour. That flavour is going to be > chocolate or vanilla every time. Groups of people don't agree on > what's cool or interesting, they agree on what's easy to agree on. >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntugnome-artwork More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
