On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 12:45 +0100, Colin Law wrote: > [...] > > Thanks for the advice Avi > > > > "On an entirely unrelated note, your signature amused me. I've never seen > > a company both explain how insecure email is and assume it's secure > > in the same wall of signature." > > > > ^^^^^^ It doesn't? It's stating that the information maybe confidential. > > i.e. relating to legal proceedings, the insecure email notice acknowledges > > that during transit or storage the email contents could change and I'm not > > liable. -- Think forensics. > > So just who is the "intended recipient" who is allowed to access, > disclose, copy, distribute or rely on the contents? All the rest of > us could easily commit a criminal offence by so doing, apparently.
The amusing part is that instead of signing the mails with any of the available standards (S/MIME, PGP/GPG; any other else?), there's a notice stating that the message (including the notice) may have been modified by a third party :) Cheers, Juan -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
