On 22/06/2011 09:14, Sean Miller wrote:
On 22 June 2011 08:59, Avi Greenbury <li...@avi.co <mailto:li...@avi.co>> wrote:

    Jon Reynolds wrote:

        1. Why on Earth did they choose to put Vista on there??

    Perhaps because a new board supposedly means a new install of
    Windows and you're not supposed to be using XP licenses any more.
    Perhaps they're also tired of supporting an OS that's way past
    end-of-life.


You sure about that?

I always believed that even an OEM licence was tied to "the machine", but if you had to replace a motherboard you could still re-install legally. The "automatic activation" facilities in XP might tell you too many aspects of the machine has changed, but a call to Microsoft can resolve that.

This is a blog post about what Microsoft class as the machine nowadays...

"4.1 We grant you a nonexclusive right to distribute an individual software license only with a fully assembled computer system. A "fully assembled computer system" means a computer system consisting of at least a central processing unit, a motherboard, a hard drive, a power supply, and a case."

You will notice the loophole that people have been exploiting (the former language which stated that an OEM desktop Operating System license could be sold with "non-peripheral hardware,") is no longer in place. It is now very simple and straightforward: an OEM license must be sold "only with a fully assembled computer system." Loophole closed.

http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mssmallbiz/archive/2005/09/07/461950.aspx

Seems pretty strict, last I heard it was tied to the motherboard and case.

Anyway, I wouldn't be inclined to re-install because I changed a motherboard anyway. I may have to install new graphics/sound drivers etc. after changing the mobo (if they were using onboard) but I don't see why a re-install would be necessary.

In the olden days Windows could be more fussy about hardware changes, such as changing from one motherboard to another. I guess this still can be the case if you're using the built in Windows disk drivers. I found that for instance going from a Pentium 4 to a Pentium 2 didn't work. A place I used to work at used to do images of Windows for deployment, they found that creating the images on newer hardware wouldn't work on older hardware, in the end we had to use the oldest hardware we had such as a P2 and install what we wanted, and then run Sysprep with the hardware drivers available for newer disk controller, otherwise the machines wouldn't boot.

I gather in Vista and Windows 7 things have improved greatly and if the machine can't boot you have the option of loading a gui recovery mode and adding drivers that way.

Rob

--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

Reply via email to