On 27 August 2010 16:30, Alan Pope <a...@popey.com> wrote: > > > On 27 Aug 2010, at 14:20, Alan Bell <alan.b...@theopenlearningcentre.com> > wrote: > >> All the pending votes have now been approved, if you have voted already >> and didn't get a mail, don't worry about it, your vote got counted. If >> you really want you can email me off list and I can confirm I have your >> email address in the list of voters. 54 voters have voted so far, > > That's about 10% of the subscribers to this list. Which is disappointing but > about par for the course in terms of people who are active in FLOSS > communities in my experience.
Prompted by this I have now voted, in order that I do not fall into the 'if you do not vote you cannot complain' camp. I was not going to vote, not due to apathy, but because I am not particularly taken by any of them, the problem is that I much preferred the old font, I think the cuddly round symetrical u and n said something about Ubuntu. I realise that there is not much that can be done about this however. I think it may be a typical case of a company spending money on design consultants (or in house designers, I do not know) and ending up with something worse that the original. I would like to suggest that if the Union Flag one wins then firstly the flag texture should be redone - it appears that more that one flag has been used to create the texture whereas the current logo appears to have been overlayed on one flag image, which I think is as it should be. Also if the flag one wins then I think it might be worth a second round trying various fonts and sizes for the uk again. Colin -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
