> > <snip>
> > 
> > >  However, I expect that the
> > > > current version of Grub is not the same as the old one and would much
> > > > appreciate it if someone would be kind enough to tell me whether or not
> > > > what I propose is feasible.
> > > 
> > > It certainly is and you don't need 2 HDs to do it. A single large one
> > > will do fine.
> > 
> > I do understand that and the drive I have is large enough to dual boot
> > on that drive the problem is that it already has Ubuntu installed on it
> > and I therefore assumed that it would be easier to dual boot by adding
> > the extra drive.
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > How does this affect your suggested method?
> > 
> Having done this, the hardest/longest part of this is getting all the correct 
> drivers into Windows.
> What I did was plug just the windows drive into the machine and get that 
> sorted with the correct drivers and updates. Once that was done, the windows 
> drive was then set to be the second drive and the Ubuntu one the first. Once 
> Ubuntu was booted 'update-grub' was run, which picked up windows.
> This arrangement has a couple of advantages in that it doesn’t modify the 
> windows drive, so no fiddling with fdisk /mbr or what ever if you wish to 
> move it later. and if there are boot problems you can just choose which drive 
> to boot from in BIOS.
> 
This is more or less what I did those years ago. The only part I did not
know about was update-grub. Does this work with the current version of
grub?

Norman



-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

Reply via email to