On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:26:25 +0100
Norman Silverstone <nor...@littletank.org> wrote:

> Thanks Liam
> 
> <snip>
> 
> >  However, I expect that the
> > > current version of Grub is not the same as the old one and would much
> > > appreciate it if someone would be kind enough to tell me whether or not
> > > what I propose is feasible.
> > 
> > It certainly is and you don't need 2 HDs to do it. A single large one
> > will do fine.
> 
> I do understand that and the drive I have is large enough to dual boot
> on that drive the problem is that it already has Ubuntu installed on it
> and I therefore assumed that it would be easier to dual boot by adding
> the extra drive.
> 
> <snip>
> 
> How does this affect your suggested method?
> 
Having done this, the hardest/longest part of this is getting all the correct 
drivers into Windows.
What I did was plug just the windows drive into the machine and get that sorted 
with the correct drivers and updates. Once that was done, the windows drive was 
then set to be the second drive and the Ubuntu one the first. Once Ubuntu was 
booted 'update-grub' was run, which picked up windows.
This arrangement has a couple of advantages in that it doesn’t modify the 
windows drive, so no fiddling with fdisk /mbr or what ever if you wish to move 
it later. and if there are boot problems you can just choose which drive to 
boot from in BIOS.



-- 
Steve Cook (Yorvyk)

http://lubuntu.net 

-- 
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/

Reply via email to