On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:27 +0100, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote: > > Nokia submitted a document that looked like it was written by a 5 year old > which basically said 'We don't want OGG media in HTML5 just in case someone > finds a patent after we have implemented it that means everyone has to pay > for it.' And then recommended to use h.264 because it already is covered by > patents. It's a ridiculous stance so good on Mozilla if they've gone against > it. > > http://www.xiph.org/press/2007/w3c/ Xiph statement > > http://digg.com/software/Nokia_wants_W3C_to_remove_Ogg_from_upcoming_HTML5_standard > Article about Nokia getting involved for no reason > > http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/Nokia.pdf Nokia's paper. Obviously > presentation, spelling and grammar wasn't an important issue. > > Darren
how funny :) Adults can be so childish :P and yeah, ff3.5 includes it already - the first install initial page has an ogg video on it :) -- Farran Lee <fazzy.bab...@ntlworld.com> I'm only 16 :P -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
