> > > > > > I'm not sure how correct this is, but I read somewhere (might've been on > here :P) that the HTML5 standard doesn't actually include the opensource > media stuff, because Microsoft and I think another corporation didn't > like it. However, Mozilla and most other groups have included it anyway. > > Tell me if I'm wrong, I probably am, but just thought I'd mention it :) > -- > Farran Lee <fazzy.bab...@ntlworld.com> > I'm only 16 :P > > > -- > ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Nokia submitted a document that looked like it was written by a 5 year old which basically said 'We don't want OGG media in HTML5 just in case someone finds a patent after we have implemented it that means everyone has to pay for it.' And then recommended to use h.264 because it already is covered by patents. It's a ridiculous stance so good on Mozilla if they've gone against it. http://www.xiph.org/press/2007/w3c/ Xiph statement http://digg.com/software/Nokia_wants_W3C_to_remove_Ogg_from_upcoming_HTML5_standard Article about Nokia getting involved for no reason http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/Nokia.pdf Nokia's paper. Obviously presentation, spelling and grammar wasn't an important issue. Darren -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
