Me again, > I think I need to read through it a few more times and annotate it to > There are also parts in there that > I recognise from somewhere (e.g. "measured inclusion rather than blanket > exclusion"), so maybe the response is just a re-iteration of official > policy.
Sorry to respond to my own post, but I just realised why it all seems so familiar -- it's almost word-for-word what's in the official press statement in response to the EDM: http://industry.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?resID=26062 Essentially it's a fob-off. JT -- ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------- James Tait, BSc | xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Programmer and Free Software advocate | Mobile: +44 (0)7779 337596 ---------------------------------------+-------------------------------- -- ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
