Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.

If upstream don't consider this appropriate for the 5.6 branch then I am
hesitant to include it in Ubuntu.

In any case, I expect 5.7 to release in Xenial so the point could be
moot for Xenial. This isn't a certainty yet though, and I'd certainly be
happier carrying this in Xenial than in previous releases.

For previous Ubuntu releases, we do as much as possible to minimise
regression risk, so again I'm doubtful that this is justified. Users who
want the speed boost can upgrade to Xenial and 5.7 when it is released,
and in general this is the advertised path to get improvements, whereas
stable releases are expected to be stable. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for our policy.

> nor does it have any custom server APIs

Is it possible that users will have third party custom compiled things
here?

This isn't by any means a final decision and I welcome further
discussion on this. My concern is that any change carries risk, and I'm
not sure a performance boost is worth that risk. Most users don't
require that since they are already deployed, and soon I'd expect new
deployments to be using Xenial where the patch is applied anyway.

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1527105

Title:
  Performance: drop HANDLE_BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1527105/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

Reply via email to