Hi. I'm following this discussion with attention and I think we need to first separate the idea from the execution, because I understand what Alberto is trying to do here: simplify documentation so the non technical user can contribute.
The thing is: documentation as it is today is needed, so more advanced users can provide more detailed reports, that in the end are going to be more useful to devs. In the end, I don't see why those two guides can't coexist, one as a quick guide, the other as advanced guide. I love the header on this page, allows me to quickly jump sections. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Overview/Install_Bugs I also like the idea about videos, since many users are willing to watch them instead of read a bunch of text. So, in the end, I think that Alberto need to keep exploring that idea as complement or introduction for the current documentation, that btw, we are assuming is still correct and relevant. We also need to be sure that the "quick version" is also useful for a correct triage of the bug. PD: It's 3am and I'm writing on the phone, so, bear with me if I'm missing some points here. -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
