* Nicholas Skaggs ([email protected]) wrote: Hi,
> To help with this I've created a series of roles for the quality > community; https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Roles/. For the tester > role, I've incorporated bugsquad activities in addition to the > traditional activities a QA team member could partake in. I feel > like the listed 'tester' role could be assumed by anyone today in > the bugsquad, but please correct me if I am wrong. We can certainly > define an additional role if it makes sense. I'm not 100% sure it's right to combine the two parts into the tester role; while it's true that I tend to run the development release, as a bug-squader I primarily triage and don't test. Other than one or two dev installs as part of a cycle, I'll tend to only test things in bugs being triaged for repeatability/repeatability on the latest dev. > I would like everyone's feedback before I think too long about the > the implementation details. Simply put, as a quality team we need to > know how to be good bug reporters. And as testers we have the skills > needed to triage and verify bugs and fixes. I think it makes sense > to utilize the skills both teams posess and combine them as part of > the quality community. Yes, I think it makes sense to combine them; in particular from triaging a lot of bugs you do tend to get a feel for things that might need more testing. Also I'm assuming where a test set is known of it would be good for triagers to help spot test escapes. Dave -- -----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code ------- / Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \ \ gro.gilbert @ treblig.org | | In Hex / \ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/ -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
