Hi all Absolutely agree with author - I think that SDK developers should think about reusing something what Qt creators called "templates" - set of C++ coded lightweight blocks of UI behavior (without any visuals). Such approach allows to save a lot of memory and CPU usage.
2015-11-30 12:47 GMT+03:00 Michael Zanetti <michael.zane...@canonical.com>: > Hi, > > On 29.11.2015 20:47, Thibaut Dedreuil_monet wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > While browsing the web this week end i read and watched the following > blog post(1) discussing about the new QT quick controls developped as a > techincal preview on QT5.6. > > > > Following their benchmark they are experiencing a reduced memory > footprint and a x10 speed increase in terms of loading compared to the > normal QTquick control. > > I was wondering if some of the ubuntu phone projects (unity8 or sdk) > would make use of these new controls in the near future to leverage some of > the speed boost that those new controls would bring. > > Unity8 doesn't really use any components at all. There's only the > occational button in the scopes, but apart from that, unity8 consists > mostly of rectangles and images. > > For the SDK it would make more sense to look at what the QtControls guys > came up with. I bet they do, but I'll let them comment on their own. In > any case, the new QtControls work quite differently than the old ones. > It's not like the Ubuntu Components could just be converted easily. > > Br, > Michael > > > > > Thanks, > > > > (1) > http://blog.qt.io/blog/2015/11/23/qt-quick-controls-re-engineered-status-update/ > > > > > > > > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
