On 04/12/14 13:18, Stephen M. Webb wrote: > On 12/04/2014 06:56 AM, Colin Watson wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 06:54:02AM -0500, Stephen M. Webb wrote: >>> For Compiz, I'll be organizing a landing today (if possible) for other >>> reasons. >> Thanks. That will automatically build with libprotobuf9, but it won't >> be possible to merge-and-clean it unless mir has been rebuilt as well, >> so perhaps it would be best to just include a mir rebuild in the same >> silo? > If ci-train is going to be down for any length of time, it would probably be > better to just do a no-change upload and > we'll pick it up for the next landing when ci-train comes back. That would > minimize delays in the queue and we're used > to that with Compiz. I can't speak for the Mir guys though. >
assuming Mir compiles and passes the automated tests with the new protobuf (which I'd expect) a no-change rebuild will be fine will be fine. -- Alan Griffiths +44 (0)798 9938 758 Octopull Ltd http://www.octopull.co.uk/ -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
