On 12/04/2014 06:06 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > There's a new version of protobuf in vivid-proposed, which now ships the > binary package libprotobuf9 rather than libprotobuf8. I'm organising > most of the required rebuilds > (http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/protobuf.html), > but there are two source packages that are normally handled by CI Train: > > compiz > mir > > (The transition page lists telephony-service and unity-system-compositor > as well, but these only have indirect dependencies on the relevant > library packages so can be ignored for this purpose.) > > Should I just rebuild these directly in vivid-proposed, or could > somebody organise a silo with no-change rebuilds for these?
For Compiz, I'll be organizing a landing today (if possible) for other reasons. -- Stephen M. Webb <stephen.w...@canonical.com> -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
