-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2014 03:05 PM, Oliver Grawert wrote: > With the current quality of changelog entries people provide to us > this is not possible at all. We have to dig into each and every > changeset and actually need to understand what code changes in > there do, changelog entries end up being something like "* rename > foo to bar" or "* new feature blah" across ten packages with no > detailed explanation at all what code was changed, if there were > added or removed dependencies or any additional code reworks.
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I disagree. I think that debian/changelog shouldn't try to go too much in detail of the changes and only highlight the packaging changes and the newly added features. I think that the information you are looking for should be found in the upstream changelog (aka bzr history, nowadays). Ciao, Alberto -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOQaRsACgkQVLQegMXeCFLMawCeOZVv0RVPZrlBLoCuc5BhIO4a HT4AnRSlqTqZzNHhcYicfslfzL36OL2B =m0II -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
