No reason to take on tech debt if we don't have to. Certainly if a bunch of people reply that it's an issue it's not impossible to do that. But cruft is cruft, I'd rather be proactive on cleaning it.
Ted On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 12:36 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: > Is there a particularly good reason to not provide a symlink, or a > wrapper script that issues a deprecation warning when run, for > compatibility? > > On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 11:13 -0500, Ted Gould wrote: > > Hello Folks, > > > > Upstart App Launch is dead, long live Ubuntu App Launch! > > > > We've discussed it before and I've got a MR ready for UAL to make the > > naming change so that we're ready to move away from Upstart as our > > Init system. I'd like to work with folks on running sed through their > > code and landing this change next week. If you've got a test script or > > something that is dependent on the name "upstart-app-launch" please be > > prepared to change. In theory, we should be able to do it in one silo > > and folks shouldn't notice, I'm just worried about dependencies that > > are external to debs or not mentioned. If you have a dependency that > > you know of that I'm unlikely to find, please mention it. > > > > If for some reason this seriously effects you in a negative way, > > please speak up now! > > > > Thanks, > > Ted > > > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
