Is there a particularly good reason to not provide a symlink, or a wrapper script that issues a deprecation warning when run, for compatibility?
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 11:13 -0500, Ted Gould wrote: > Hello Folks, > > Upstart App Launch is dead, long live Ubuntu App Launch! > > We've discussed it before and I've got a MR ready for UAL to make the > naming change so that we're ready to move away from Upstart as our > Init system. I'd like to work with folks on running sed through their > code and landing this change next week. If you've got a test script or > something that is dependent on the name "upstart-app-launch" please be > prepared to change. In theory, we should be able to do it in one silo > and folks shouldn't notice, I'm just worried about dependencies that > are external to debs or not mentioned. If you have a dependency that > you know of that I'm unlikely to find, please mention it. > > If for some reason this seriously effects you in a negative way, > please speak up now! > > Thanks, > Ted > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
