It also solves the problem of an OEM/Carrier not wanting to ship with any specific apps (i.e. terminal)
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Alex Chiang <achi...@canonical.com> wrote: > I am not against this plan, but I do have a question. > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sergio Schvezov > <sergio.schve...@canonical.com> wrote: > > > > - the new common rootfs should have no click apps per default > > - the rootfs we know today would be a special case of customization > > Can you expand on this? Does this mean we would deliver the default > click apps using the custom tarball mechanism? > > If so, do we need to test the possibility of having multiple > simultaneous custom tarballs? > > If not, how will this be delivered? > > > - this opens the possibility of having a better set for phone and > > tablet (different customizations, preinstalled apps that is). > > What is the problem "no preinstalled apps" solving other than > "different core apps on tablet vs phone"? > > Thanks. > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp