On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Alex Chiang <achi...@canonical.com> wrote: > I am not against this plan, but I do have a question. > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Sergio Schvezov > <sergio.schve...@canonical.com> wrote: >> >> - the new common rootfs should have no click apps per default >> - the rootfs we know today would be a special case of customization > > Can you expand on this? Does this mean we would deliver the default > click apps using the custom tarball mechanism? > > If so, do we need to test the possibility of having multiple > simultaneous custom tarballs? > > If not, how will this be delivered? > >> - this opens the possibility of having a better set for phone and >> tablet (different customizations, preinstalled apps that is). > > What is the problem "no preinstalled apps" solving other than > "different core apps on tablet vs phone"?
Cleaner overlays; unless we say com.ubuntu.gallery and com.ubuntu.camera are mandatory; it should be easy for a vendor to provide com.vendor.gallery and com.vendor.camera instead. I can be a stone age manager and want to build a customization for my enterprise with no games on it by default is another thing I can think of :-) So instead of 'uninstalling/unregistering' them from the default image; it would just not be installed. cjwatson mention that this is really not necessary; but I still wanted to explore the alternative. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp