Top didn't really show anything using the CPU all that much that I could tell. Also my cpu fan didn't turn up to higher speeds, which normally that load average for any more than a few minutes would at least kick it up a notch or two. Right now it is sitting "idle" at 0.5 which I would still consider higher than it should be, top showing mythfrontend and mythbackend using 1% of the cpu and nothing else really anything. Isn't the load average more than just cpu usage and can be impacted by io waits and other factors? Maybe there isn't something sitting in the cpu queue but instead waiting for some sort of io that is delayed, and would also explain why the load is higher but my cpu is not hotter.
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Eric Shubert <e...@shubes.net> wrote: > After the update, was it perhaps building locate or man page indexes? Or > maybe some other background activity? > > > On 05/10/2012 08:35 PM, Nick Caldwell wrote: > >> Actually it looks like the numbers are a bit lower than they were when I >> first installed, but still higher than I would think and idling machine >> should be at. I am running 3.2.0-24 kernel. When I first installed this >> version the load average was between .7 and .8, I have run Myth back to >> .22 I think? I don't remember them ever being that high just at idle. >> Today they are in the .3s. When I took this my box had only been up 3.5 >> hours, it turns itself on right before I get home and shuts itself off >> late on work nights, so I generally don't have it up for more than 3 >> days at a time over a weekend. >> >> From /proc/cpuinfo: >> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD >> cpu family : 15 >> model : 35 >> model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ >> stepping : 2 >> >> >> Inline image 1 >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Cliff Dunn >> <alld...@gmail.com >> <mailto:alld...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I don't know if my top screenshot came through on my last email, but >> I am attaching it again if not. It appears that Mythfrontend is >> using the majority of the cpu. I haven't actually tried killing >> that process yet to see if the load comes down to something I would >> expect. I would definitely be interested in your numbers. And like >> you I have dual HD ATSC tuners on my backend/frontend combo. I have >> noticed the load up to and above 2.00 since the upgrade on that >> machine during recording/watching TV. The machine seems to >> definitely be keeping up but I am obviously nearing my threshold on >> my dual core proc. Seems like such unnecessary high utilization >> when I was seeing things so low before the upgrades. >> >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Nick Caldwell >> <kg6...@gmail.com >> <mailto:kg6...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I did the upgrade about two weeks ago and noticed the same >> thing. I did a clean install of Mythbuntu 12.04, my load average >> was pretty low, 0.10s or something (in previous versions) when >> it was doing nothing and now it sits around 0.8 to 1.0 when >> doing nothing. I have dual hdtv inputs and it still seems to be >> able to keep up recording on both and playing back a recording >> while running mythcomflag, so I haven't really concerned myself >> with it. Also my cpu fan does not turn on to higher speeds even >> though typically it would, so I presumed the load number is just >> wrong, and not that the load is really that high. If I look at >> top or iotop they are sitting pretty idle as well. >> >> I also have an AMD CPU, I forget which exact one but I can send >> my system info once I get home if it helps. I presume this to be >> an ubuntu problem though. >> >> Nick >> >> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Cliff Dunn >> <alld...@gmail.com >> <mailto:alld...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I have noticed that after I updated from Mythbuntu 11.10 and >> MythTV 0.24 to 12.04/0.25 that my load averages are much >> higher. I am running AMD Athlon X2 260 processor. Before the >> upgrade, with Mythfrontend idle, I would see a load average >> of no more than 0.05. Now I am seeing the below average when >> idle with much higher loads when actually watching >> something. I am curious if you guys have noticed anything >> similar? >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list >> Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com >> >> <mailto:Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.**ubuntu.com<Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com> >> > >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list >> Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com >> >> <mailto:Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.**ubuntu.com<Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com> >> > >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list >> Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com >> <mailto:Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.**ubuntu.com<Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com> >> > >> >> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >> >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/**mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv> >> >> >> >> >> > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > > > -- > Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list > Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/** > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv> >
-- Ubuntu-mythtv mailing list Ubuntu-mythtv@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mythtv