On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Siegfried-Angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jordan: The intention of this is not to let the list look better, but > to don't waste time reviewing the packages of those people who we have > already lost and who may not come back again, but instead to focus on > the packages of contributors who are still active.
I thought the point of REVU was about getting packages into Ubuntu, not filtering out people who got discouraged. >> not throw away hard work in order to make our todo list look better. > There isn't anything being "thrown away". The packages would still be > listed on the front page (they won't even be archived), just displayed > on a different section. That seems reasonable, but I wouldn't base it on something so trivial as intrepid vs. jaunty. I'd think something like packages who haven't had a comment from the uploader is so much time. We certainly should prioritize packages that have received *no* review. -Jordan -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
