Hi,
Julius Bloch a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, den 20.02.2007, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Mirjam Wäckerlin:
>
>
>> What do you think about it? Are there more advantages than the
>> problems I listed and would you like to keep gobby? And if yes, do you
>> have proposals to eliminate those problems?
>>
>
> There are several adavantages for gobby
>
> * You don't need a special syntax, like the moinmoin syntax in the wiki
> * More then one person a time can change the content
> * You don't need an account
>
I tend to agree with Julius, gobby is realy easy and fun to use for
colaborative edition (by collaborative, I mean at the same time). You do
not need the "chat lock" ("I am editing the page"). I am one of the
French translator, we tried wiki and gobby and we are happy gobby users
for translation parties.
If I understood well, nowadays, the articles are submited via the wiki
and the final "packaging" is done on gobby. This looks like a good
solution to me. The "gobby" phase was a bit long this time due to
unavailablity from members of the team. We can not blame them for that.
Submiting articles by posting on this maling list is another solution.
Concerning starting the translation before letter is published,
regarding past experiences, it is not a good idea : UWN may change until
it is published, so we (French translators) now wait the final publication.
Cheers,
Lionel
--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
