On 8/1/06, Robert McWilliam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 10:55:29 +0600, "Vid Ayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Kicking members off arbitrarily for no reason is not very welcoming
> IMHO.
Agreed. (For anyone who missed my earlier rants...)
> This happened last month too but we were given to understand
> that it was discussed on IRC.
>
> https://launchpad.net/people/ubuntu-marketing/+members , shows
> different expiration dates for different members while some members
> don't have any expiration dates set at all.
Yes, some older members have no expiry dates at, having joined before
the current policy.
>
I think the current policy is that when you join the team you get a 1
month membership, and if there are signs of life from you it is upped to
1 year, I'm not sure what the criteria for getting no expiry is - looks
to be mostly canonical employees and admins. The loads of random looking
dates are that they are all calculated from when the person joined the
team.
> Usually, most teams on LP have a standard policy for all members,
> either no expiration dates or single policy based on number of years.
> Shouldn't MT have an *equal* policy for its all team members ?
Yes it should. I should note that no other team has a similar policy.
We have trailblazed nicely and found the apple to be bitter. Unless I
hear any objections, I am going to (if I can with LP), change
everybodies subscriptions to non-expiring. As this may involve
removing you and readding you, don't be alarmed if you see a removal
and readdition notice tomorrow. In any case, your removal notice will
explain why you are being removed (technical) and that you will be
shortly be readded.
Cheers,
Corey
--
ubuntu-marketing mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
