Images are re-spinning again now, hopefully upower/ubiquity is all fixed on them.
On 24/02/16 16:33, Tim wrote: > Ali's respins failed. I retried and now there is a i386 image with the upower > bug fix, no amd64 image as yet though > > On 24/02/16 12:26, Ali/amjjawad wrote: >> Hi Lance and everyone else, >> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Erick Brunzell <lbsol...@yahoo.com >> <mailto:lbsol...@yahoo.com>> wrote: >> >> On 02/23/2016 05:42 PM, Ali/amjjawad wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am extremely busy in real life and not in good health (back/neck >>> problems) as I'm about to shift houses for the 4th or 5th times in 2 >>> years so you can imagine :) >>> >>> However, living in pain is easier than NOT supporting Ubuntu GNOME. So >>> please, do help us! >>> >>> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds >>> >>> In case you don't know: >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule >>> >>> Please test and as you may know, report any bug to the ISO Tracker. >>> >>> If you're new to all this, here is a good place to start from: >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/Testing >>> >>> The release notes: >>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/Beta1/UbuntuGNOME >>> >>> Please update the release notes whenever possible. >>> >>> I see, yet again, no one is paying attention to i386 so I'll do my best >>> in that area. >> I am paying attention. >> >> >> Yes, I know you do ;) >> >> >> >> As you can see from my posted results both the amd64 and i386 images are >> basically junk! I also encountered an installation failure but >> ubuntu-bug ubiquity complained about a lack of space on the live DVD, >> how is that possible? >> >> Anyway I'll try and reproduce that behavior as time allows but right now >> I'm trying to recover from a failed Trusty -> Xenial upgrade so I >> can file a release-upgrader bug the smart way. If that fails I'll have >> to file a must less useful bug report the dumb way. >> >> >> These are mess so here is what I was doing just a while ago: >> >> <amjjawad> Oh, launchpad is down/broken for some reason! why such things >> happen during before a milestone release?! >> <amjjawad> infinity, I'm testing Ubuntu GNOME images and these are true mess >> :( >> <infinity> amjjawad: Security updates, it's only temporary. >> <wxl> amjjawad: for more info on that, see #canonical-sysadmin. >> <amjjawad> infinity, the installation is broken and I just can't install >> anything. >> <amjjawad> wxl, "Technically, this is a 503 error and has been caused by our >> database being temporarily offline. " but thanks for your advice :) >> <wxl> amjjawad: have you read the topic at #canonical-sysadmin? >> <amjjawad> infinity, >> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds/113126/testcases >> <infinity> amjjawad: I'm staying far away from this milestone. >> <wxl> amjjawad: you can see who is involved in this milestone here >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseTaskSignup >> <wxl> suffice it to say, flocculant is asleep >> <wxl> i believe stgraber is handling the canonical side of things, right, >> infinity ? >> <amjjawad> Thanks infinity and wxl then guess I have to wait as there is >> nothing I can do except confirming bugs. >> <wxl> amjjawad: you do know you can get around the upower bug by running off >> ac power only, right? >> <infinity> The upower bug was fixed, it just needs a respin. >> <amjjawad> wxl, I'm testing on Oracle VB. Not sure if that applies to that >> as well?! >> <infinity> (which stgraber left up to the flavours to do themselves) >> <wxl> infinity: not true. flocculant triggered a respin and doesn't work. >> <amjjawad> how can I know if I have access to do a re-spin or not? can I try? >> <amjjawad> to be more accurate: a re-spin for Ubuntu GNOME images only. >> <wxl> amjjawad: if you have an SSO login to the tracker and you have an LP >> membership that allows you to, for example, mark images as ready, >> you can select a rebuild in the same area there >> <wxl> amjjawad: just click the right images, and click rebuild. bvut again, >> i don't think it will help >> <amjjawad> wxl, indeed, I have access to mark them as ready but never >> touched "re-spin" as of now. >> <infinity> lftp cdimage.ubuntu.com:/ubuntu-gnome/daily-live/20160222.2> cat >> xenial-desktop-amd64.manifest | grep upower >> <wxl> amjjawad: and yes, if your host has a battery, remove the battery and >> run off of AC power and your vm will work. >> <infinity> gir1.2-upowerglib-1.0 0.99.4-1 >> <infinity> The latest version isn't in those images. >> <infinity> libupower-glib3:amd64 0.99.4-1 >> <infinity> upower 0.99.4-1 >> <infinity> wxl: It'll help. >> <wxl> infinity: it isn't in the xubuntu images? >> * anpok has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) >> <amjjawad> darkxst, I'll give it a go! >> * kenvandine has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) >> <infinity> wxl: The newest xubuntu images have -2. >> <cyphermox> infinity: jibel asked me to do a respin earlier too, but I have >> no access to do that >> <wxl> infinity: --which is supposedly the fix, right? >> <infinity> wxl: Yes. >> <wxl> infinity: and what i'm telling you is dear flocculant already tested >> it and no dice. >> <wxl> infinity: i know the bug is fix released. i know pitti worked on it. >> it didn't fix it. >> <amjjawad> is there any harm if one does a re-spin?! >> <infinity> Or the testing methodology was lacking. I'm happy to believe >> both. >> <infinity> amjjawad: No. >> <wxl> amjjawad: no harm. go for it. >> <amjjawad> perfect :D >> <wxl> amjjawad: if you DO get success, let me know. >> <amjjawad> wxl, sure ;) >> <wxl> amjjawad: but the battery removal WILL work. >> <amjjawad> request a rebuild, right? >> <wxl> do it >> <amjjawad> wxl, yes, will remember the battery thing. >> >> >> >> >> Lance >> >> PS: the 20160221 amd64 image had far fewer problems so something got >> borked in the last 48 hours or so. >> >> >> >> I requested a re-build: >> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds >> >> >> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> -- >>> Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us." >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad> >>> >>> >>> >> >> I will keep you posted/updated (hopefully) in any case whether all is good >> or not. >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> -- >> Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us." >> >> Best Regards, >> Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad> >> >> >> > -- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
