Hi Lance and everyone else, On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Erick Brunzell <lbsol...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 02/23/2016 05:42 PM, Ali/amjjawad wrote: > > Hi, > > I am extremely busy in real life and not in good health (back/neck > problems) as I'm about to shift houses for the 4th or 5th times in 2 years > so you can imagine :) > > However, living in pain is easier than NOT supporting Ubuntu GNOME. So > please, do help us! > > http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds > > In case you don't know: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseSchedule > > Please test and as you may know, report any bug to the ISO Tracker. > > If you're new to all this, here is a good place to start from: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/Testing > > The release notes: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/Beta1/UbuntuGNOME > > Please update the release notes whenever possible. > > I see, yet again, no one is paying attention to i386 so I'll do my best in > that area. > > > I am paying attention. > Yes, I know you do ;) > As you can see from my posted results both the amd64 and i386 images are > basically junk! I also encountered an installation failure but ubuntu-bug > ubiquity complained about a lack of space on the live DVD, how is that > possible? > > Anyway I'll try and reproduce that behavior as time allows but right now > I'm trying to recover from a failed Trusty -> Xenial upgrade so I can file > a release-upgrader bug the smart way. If that fails I'll have to file a > must less useful bug report the dumb way. > These are mess so here is what I was doing just a while ago: <amjjawad> Oh, launchpad is down/broken for some reason! why such things happen during before a milestone release?! <amjjawad> infinity, I'm testing Ubuntu GNOME images and these are true mess :( <infinity> amjjawad: Security updates, it's only temporary. <wxl> amjjawad: for more info on that, see #canonical-sysadmin. <amjjawad> infinity, the installation is broken and I just can't install anything. <amjjawad> wxl, "Technically, this is a 503 error and has been caused by our database being temporarily offline. " but thanks for your advice :) <wxl> amjjawad: have you read the topic at #canonical-sysadmin? <amjjawad> infinity, http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds/113126/testcases <infinity> amjjawad: I'm staying far away from this milestone. <wxl> amjjawad: you can see who is involved in this milestone here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseTaskSignup <wxl> suffice it to say, flocculant is asleep <wxl> i believe stgraber is handling the canonical side of things, right, infinity ? <amjjawad> Thanks infinity and wxl then guess I have to wait as there is nothing I can do except confirming bugs. <wxl> amjjawad: you do know you can get around the upower bug by running off ac power only, right? <infinity> The upower bug was fixed, it just needs a respin. <amjjawad> wxl, I'm testing on Oracle VB. Not sure if that applies to that as well?! <infinity> (which stgraber left up to the flavours to do themselves) <wxl> infinity: not true. flocculant triggered a respin and doesn't work. <amjjawad> how can I know if I have access to do a re-spin or not? can I try? <amjjawad> to be more accurate: a re-spin for Ubuntu GNOME images only. <wxl> amjjawad: if you have an SSO login to the tracker and you have an LP membership that allows you to, for example, mark images as ready, you can select a rebuild in the same area there <wxl> amjjawad: just click the right images, and click rebuild. bvut again, i don't think it will help <amjjawad> wxl, indeed, I have access to mark them as ready but never touched "re-spin" as of now. <infinity> lftp cdimage.ubuntu.com:/ubuntu-gnome/daily-live/20160222.2> cat xenial-desktop-amd64.manifest | grep upower <wxl> amjjawad: and yes, if your host has a battery, remove the battery and run off of AC power and your vm will work. <infinity> gir1.2-upowerglib-1.0 0.99.4-1 <infinity> The latest version isn't in those images. <infinity> libupower-glib3:amd64 0.99.4-1 <infinity> upower 0.99.4-1 <infinity> wxl: It'll help. <wxl> infinity: it isn't in the xubuntu images? * anpok has quit (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) <amjjawad> darkxst, I'll give it a go! * kenvandine has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) <infinity> wxl: The newest xubuntu images have -2. <cyphermox> infinity: jibel asked me to do a respin earlier too, but I have no access to do that <wxl> infinity: --which is supposedly the fix, right? <infinity> wxl: Yes. <wxl> infinity: and what i'm telling you is dear flocculant already tested it and no dice. <wxl> infinity: i know the bug is fix released. i know pitti worked on it. it didn't fix it. <amjjawad> is there any harm if one does a re-spin?! <infinity> Or the testing methodology was lacking. I'm happy to believe both. <infinity> amjjawad: No. <wxl> amjjawad: no harm. go for it. <amjjawad> perfect :D <wxl> amjjawad: if you DO get success, let me know. <amjjawad> wxl, sure ;) <wxl> amjjawad: but the battery removal WILL work. <amjjawad> request a rebuild, right? <wxl> do it <amjjawad> wxl, yes, will remember the battery thing. > > Lance > > PS: the 20160221 amd64 image had far fewer problems so something got > borked in the last 48 hours or so. > I requested a re-build: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/357/builds > > > Thank you! > > -- > Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us." > > Best Regards, > Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad> > > > > > I will keep you posted/updated (hopefully) in any case whether all is good or not. Thanks! -- Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us." Best Regards, Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad>
-- Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
