On 04/29/17 19:35, Ketil Malde wrote: > > > I'm still waiting for my big run to complete, but I have a smaller test > > Unfortunately, the new executable appears to fail for the same data that > the old one did. So if there is indeed a subtle bug hidden in libjudy, > it doesn't seem to be affected by these options.
I'm not sure that I would jump directly to the bug being in Judy. Judy is a VERY mature library that has been widely deployed for over two decades. As you noted there were reports of compiler optimizations leading to some crashes but a root cause was never identified for those specific reports. Unfortunately, being a library means that there is always additional third party code involved which makes debugging quite challenging. The best suggestion that I can offer at this point is to have you post directly to the upstream Judy mailing list for additional assistance. https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/judy-devel Troy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
