My 2 cents.
Let other distros do this first. Wait 5 years to allow problems to be sorted 
out. Then discuss again. 

--
A bug magnet

El Dec 5, 2011, a las 12:15, Matt Alexander <ubuntu....@mattalexander.com> 
escribió:

> Sure, using find or which, etc., can be used to locate a particular app, but 
> that's not really the point.  Why not simplify things and put all binaries 
> under /usr/bin?  Then you don't have to teach users about silly distinctions 
> like "Oh, see, if it's an app that's meant to be used by a System 
> Adminstrator, then it goes into /usr/sbin".  Who cares?  Just put everything 
> in /usr/bin to keep things simple.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 4:24 AM, Dane Mutters <dmutt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know if the original poster has since learned this, but I think it's 
> worth noting several things, in case the person coming over from Windows 
> hasn't figured it out.  (If this is a non-issue, please disregard this email.)
> 
> 1) Linux/Unix executables don't have a .exe extension.  Typically, they don't 
> have any extension at all, and can conceivably have every extension 
> imaginable (including common ones like .sh for scripts).  If you're looking 
> for an executable, forget looking for its extension.  Try using the "find" 
> command to look for executable files, or if you know the one you want, 
> already, use the "which" command, as above.
> 
> 2) You almost certainly don't need to find that file.  As mentioned above, if 
> it's not in your PATH setting, then something is broken.  This is pretty 
> rare.  If you need to execute a command--from a terminal or from an "open 
> with" dialogue, just type the command (in the appropriate dialogue box, as 
> needed).  If you want to open a PDF, and the GUI hasn't figured out how to do 
> that, type "acroread", "evince", or whatever you have installed into the box.
> 
> 3) <rant> +1 about Windows having an absurdly hard-to-use filesystem, where 
> finding binaries/executables is concerned.  Once you learn Linux, you'll 
> bless its build-in filesystem, and probably find little/no need to mess with 
> it.  For that matter, +1 to all the stuff about /bin, /sbin, /usr/local/bin, 
> /usr/local/sbin, /opt, etc. having useful, specific purposes.  Sure, it bugs 
> me when some program insists on installing someplace I don't think makes 
> sense.  Usually it'll let me change it upon install, if it's from a script, 
> but if not, I can still put it into the PATH if it's not already there, and 
> after that it doesn't matter!  So long as the uninstall functionality works 
> for a given program (which it REALLY, REALLY should...), and the executable 
> structure of the program is remotely sensible (looking at you, OpenOffice, 
> Mozilla, etc.), it's all gravy, so far as I'm concerned.  Proprietary 
> programs are the more problematic culprits, anyway, and there's not much a 
> distribution can do about them, so far as I'm aware.  </rant>
> 
> 4) I've never liked Fedora, anyway.  :-p
> 
> 
> I'm sure the real gurus here know a lot more about the specifics than I do, 
> so have at it!
> 
> --Dane
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:40:31AM +0800, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> > We could even enhance which to look in obvious places off the path (perhaps
> > locatedb?)  and print the output on stderr if we really wanted to.
> 
> Please don't - 'which' is used in scripts and needs to preserve its
> current behaviour.  Any extra behaviour should be added to a
> different/new program.
> 
> --
> Colin Watson                                       [cjwat...@ubuntu.com]
> 
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
> 
> 
> --
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
> Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
-- 
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss

Reply via email to