Mike Jones wrote: > This discussion has gone on long enough that I'm no longer able to tell > what we are discussing.
Neal posted a GNOME bug report (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554172) which I think sums up the issues really well. I agree with Evan that there are two issues: a) What should be expressed as powers of 2 vs. powers of 10? b) What names should we use for powers of 2 and 10? As to (a): There are a few places where there is a strong technical reason to prefer powers of 2. For example, memory is designed in such a way that you will always have a round number of bytes in base 2, but never in base 10. Everywhere else, there are strong arguments on both sides, including for instance: * 30 years of precedent for base 2 in the computing community * 300 years of precedent for base 10 in the scientific community * Interoperatibility with other systems (e.g. Windows) * Compliance to relevant standards (e.g. POSIX) So far as I can tell, everyone has made up their mind about which of these issues outweigh which other issues. Further debate is likely to produce lots of heat and little light. As to (b): I think the issue can be summarised like this: As developers of the English language, we get words from the dictionary (our upstream provider), and hand them on to users (our downstream receiver). We have agreement that the words are defined upstream as kilo=1000/kibi=1024, but do not have agreement on whether a valid bug report has been filed by downstream. This is a serious issue because the English language has a long and proud tradition of being modified solely through patches working their way upstream. Some people believe that any attempt to impose words from the top is an inappropriate attempt to grab power, which should be resisted on principle. Some people believe this is an especially egregious example because the computing community was hardly consulted at all, and strongly objected where it was consulted. My personal opinions: My understanding is that GNOME shies away from configuration options where possible, whereas KDE quite likes them. As such, I doubt that GNOME developers would be willing to make this configurable. Even if they did, you still have to discuss which option is the default. As I mentioned elsewhere[1], not all standards are equal. It's important that we consider standards seriously, but that doesn't mean automatic adoption. As far as I'm concerned, the most important thing is that the UI uses words consistently. A close second-most important thing is that the UI uses words that users can understand and mentally manipulate. I have no strong opinion right now about whether "giga" should mean 10^9 or 2^30, but I do have a strong opinion that ordinary users can't define the word at all. IMHO, the only words that are widely recognised by ordinary users are "million", "billion" etc. As Scott mentioned, the definitions for these words vary[2], but I believe this can be managed with localisations. Since ordinary users don't have any words for large powers of 2, I would expect them to have difficulty thinking in base 2 no matter what words are used. Here's a thought experiment: in base 6, try calculating 4 + 4. Even if you understand perfectly what I mean, I bet you have to use your fingers :) - Andrew [1]https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2009-June/008376.html [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
