On Wednesday 20 August 2008 10:31, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > Paul Smith wrote on 20/08/08 15:20: > >... > > On the other hand I do think it's worthwhile to somehow mark bugs which > > are not sufficiently documented as to be reproducible/fixable. > >... > > So, if there is no suitable bug state existing already we need a new > > state for these kinds of bugs. We can call it "watching", or > > "insufficient information", or "can not reproduce", or whatever. > > That state already exists: it's called "Incomplete". > Right, but given the current plans for auto expiration, at some point the difference between Incomplete and Invalid will be only a certain number of days, so in the end it amounts to the same thing.
Scott K -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
