-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul Smith wrote on 20/08/08 15:20: >... > On the other hand I do think it's worthwhile to somehow mark bugs which > are not sufficiently documented as to be reproducible/fixable. >... > So, if there is no suitable bug state existing already we need a new > state for these kinds of bugs. We can call it "watching", or > "insufficient information", or "can not reproduce", or whatever.
That state already exists: it's called "Incomplete". > But > it should not be "invalid"... or at least not have the current behavior > of invalid, where once the bug is marked that way it, and all dups of > it, drop off the edge of the world. >... It is an error to mark a valid bug report as a duplicate of an Invalid one. If apport is doing that, please report a bug about apport. Cheers - -- Matthew Paul Thomas http://mpt.net.nz/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIrCrX6PUxNfU6ecoRAgNlAJ473JF7HNezUxcx3l5FY80b4QMTIACdGkPp yTDROCzW/leinjEJnSbtuW8= =PvY0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
