On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 11:59 -0400, Cory K. wrote: > Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > > would basic defaults making > > jackd output to PulseAudio hurt anybody? Sure it would be slow, it would > > not be serious at all, but would it allow people that can stand that use > > JACK then? Others, as you said, will configure it. > > > > Yes. It would hurt people expecting a particular latency. Look thorough > the ubuntu-studio-users mailing list about this. Getting JACK to work > with PulseAudio is the lesser issue to getting good latency timings. > > In talking to the guys on #jack, #ardour and Paul Davis himself routing > JACK through Pulse Audio by default is a bad idea. You think this is > heated? You should have been on IRC when I posed these JACK through PA > by default questions. ;) > > In Ubuntu Studio we have a wrapper script around jackd to stop Pulse for > JACK and restart it once done. This is what most users have wanted based > on feedback. > > If latency isn't an issue, use Jokosher or maybe Audacity. People who > need to use Ardour need the performance JACK and Ardour can provide > without added overhead. > has anyone thought about setting up a jack/ardour/pulseaudio howto somewhere? as i mentioned in another post earlier in this thread, i don think there is a potential userbase -- podcasters & audio editors -- for whom ardour would be a really excellent solution, if they could just get it to work without lots of fiddling with sounddaemons. is there anyone who agrees with me?
matt > -Cory \m/ > -- Matt Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
