I brought this up on #gnome-hackers a while back. I absolutely agree that crash data should be sent to a crash service instead, and bugs should be created and linked to one or more crashes as a result, when someone with technical knowledge can analyse what's going on.
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 14:02 +1300, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Feb 13, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:55:20PM +1300, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote: > > ... > >> Which is one of the reasons Ubuntu, like other software projects, > >> should record crashes somewhere other than the bugtracker. (Sorry to > >> bang that drum again.;-) > > > > I'm not aware of anyone arguing against this idea; in fact, it has > > received substantial public support from a number of people (myself > > included), even before the client infrastructure existed, so there's > > no need to defend it any further. > > > > Instead, can you tell us about the progress of the server side > > implementation in Launchpad? > > ... > > I'll gladly be corrected, but as far as I know no-one is working on the > server, and I doubt that Launchpad would be a good home for it anyway. > It may be better as a standalone system (like Mozilla uses) that is > designed to handle anonymous submissions, to allow deletions of old > records, and to have greater uptime thanks to fewer and quicker server > updates. > > - -- > Matthew Paul Thomas > http://mpt.net.nz/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFF0Q4n6PUxNfU6ecoRAs2mAJoCT/+TBK7zylaCApuNd176ey6kiQCfaMqn > eBGC38ZWKeF8vR9YBPwBHL8= > =VbX5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- Alex Jones http://alex.weej.com/ -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
