Hi Chuck,

Actually, it's not true that post-release patches must be "security-
only".  According to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelUpdates they are also
appropriate for "Critical bug fixes" and "Supported vendor patches".
Since they define "Critical bug fixes" as "non-security issues relating
to bugs that affect a large range of users" this would not fall under
that classification (since it only affects those with this particular
hardware).  This would then fall under "Supported vendor patches".  In
hindsight, I should have probably compiled my own package and put it in
a "separate repository/pocket/PPA".

That wasn't my main criticism, however.  My main criticism was that the
bug was _completely_ ignored for well over a year and 2 versions past
what it applied to.  Even a simple comment on this bug that mentioned
the kernel update policy or even just a modification of the "Importance"
field would have been enough for me to withdraw that criticism.
However, the way it appears to me is that Ubuntu can't even keep up with
the bugs that its users submit so why should they bother.  I hate to see
Ubuntu fail under the weight of its own popularity but I suppose that's
simply the price of "success".

BTW, I do want to thank you for your comments and investigations of this
when I first submitted it.  I thought they were very helpful!

-- 
[Edgy PATCH] Radio on PVR-150 outputs only noise.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to