I think before we start removing stuff that still builds, we need to
verify that the alternative (fuse3) does what fuse2 does for the
appimage apps.
We tend to be way too cavalier in removing stuff that is perfectly
functional without good reason (security, FTBFS, etc.) so unless fuse3
does the job of fuse2 for appimages, I don't think this is a good idea.
Marking as "Won't Fix" unless I can be compelled otherwise.
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2172656
Title:
Don't recommend libfuse2t64
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-budgie-meta/+bug/2172656/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
