> How do you feel about libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2.0 vs libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6.2 vs libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6?
My feeling is that libclang.so.21.0.0dpcpp6 is the way to go, as it would be the safest approach. One thing I'm wondering is if there is any correspondence between DPC++ versions and LLVM/Clang version. For example, does a major or minor version bump for DPC++ signify a major version bump in LLVM/Clang? I don't think so but I'll ask in the GitHub thread. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2130186 Title: [needs-packaging] intel-dpcpp To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2130186/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
