Thanks for the explanation on #4, I'm totally fine with that.
Maybe leave (no urgency or blocker) a hint at that in the conf file?

Thanks for looking into #2 and #3, but as I said #3 is for this case
entirely for overachievers :-)

On #1 thought, I understand that is the case.
It is good that it will be added to the manual tests - that is a nice of you.
What I look for is how we will ensure such HW will stay available over the 
lifetime.
From [1] it sounds like being close to "an engineering sample in engineers home 
on TBD team, manager TBD". Just that they are no samples, but real devices.

Making that clear to everyone will help, and it also makes the
implications clear that such devices can not be thrown away as long as
this is meant to be supported.

Do you happen to know if there are any of these in the Cert lab as well?
IIRC Matthieu also had one, maybe you and him can sign up for "and we will keep 
them to verify this" :-) ?

At the end, please update the initial request to state the things now clarified.
Then after your updated feedback to #1 and maybe #2/#3 this should be good to 
go.

[1]: https://github.com/cpaelzer/ubuntu-
mir/commit/92fb3a7c8ee17b0c10d9e697a112a8dab2b64ad9

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2074078

Title:
  [MIR] ubuntu-x13s-settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-x13s-settings/+bug/2074078/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to