The ldconfig aspect is just a guess on my part. Assuming that
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2.dpkg-new was not created by
renaming of /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so, it is unclear to
me how a process would end up using it—it has to be listed in
/etc/ld.so.cache for that to happen.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943124

Title:
  Upgrade fails due to "text file busy"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1943124/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to