To me, the clue is the ETXTBSY for ld-linux-x86-64.so.2.dpkg-new (with the suffix). I can't quite see how this could become used without a reference from /etc/ld.so.cache. And I think according to the ldconfig heuristic, ld-linux-x86-64.so.2.dpkg-new is considered a newer version than ld-linux-x86-64.so.2. (Maybe we should not apply this heuristic if a file with the exact soname exists.)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943124 Title: Upgrade fails due to "text file busy" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1943124/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
