Hi Brian, I have updated the description. Does it help?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:01 PM Brian Murray <1894...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > >From the bug description its not clear to me why this change should be > SRU'ed to Focal or what the benefit to end users is. Could someone > please elaborate on that? Thanks! > > ** Changed in: ceph (Ubuntu Focal) > Status: Triaged => Incomplete > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453 > > Title: > Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo > > Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive: > Invalid > Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive queens series: > Triaged > Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive stein series: > Triaged > Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive train series: > Triaged > Status in Ubuntu Cloud Archive ussuri series: > Triaged > Status in ceph package in Ubuntu: > Fix Released > Status in ceph source package in Bionic: > Triaged > Status in ceph source package in Focal: > Incomplete > > Bug description: > [Impact] > This is to consider/discuss the possibility of whether the Ceph packages > (UCA) should be built with RelWithDebInfo build option (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE > [0]) which can be supplied to the build script do_cmake.sh [1]. > > Currently, Upstream as well as UCA builds default to 'Debug' [0] > builds. But is any reason why shouldn't go for RelWithDebInfo (i.e. > "Release with Debug information")? > > There's one issue noted with RelWithDebInfo which has a workaround too > [2]. > > In general, gcc's -O2 [3] build should generate better code as well as > there's a specific case for Ceph [4] that it improves performance. > > [0] https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.html > > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/do_cmake.sh > > [2] https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/perf/#common-issues > > [3] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html > > [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316 > > [Test Case] > Standard ceph-backed OpenStack regression will be run, consisting of > juju-deployed OpenStack+ceph and tempest regression testing against the > deployment. > > [Regression Potential] > As Ponnuvel mentioned, the size of binaries will be slightly bigger and > also the build/compilation will be longer. > Ponnuvel also did a search of pponnuvel i'd search of upstream bugs at > https://tracker.ceph.com and didn't find any relevant bugs. > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions > -- Regards, Ponnuvel ** Bug watch added: Gentoo Bugzilla #733316 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733316 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894453 Title: Building Ceph packages with RelWithDebInfo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1894453/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
