Phillip Susi [2011-01-15  5:40 -0000]:
> It looks to me like what it is doing is promoting the 255 to a signed
> short, which sign extends to 0xFFFF

That sounds wrong, though. 0xFFFF is not 255 in any kind of data type.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685352

Title:
  libplymouth2_0.8.2-2ubuntu6 and later give ragged splash and text
  rendering

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to