Phillip Susi [2011-01-15 19:35 -0000]: > 255 is 0xFF, which when you sign extend to 16 bits is 0xFFFF.
Yes, but gcc claiming that FFFF would be a valid representation of 255 sounds wrong to me. -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685352 Title: libplymouth2_0.8.2-2ubuntu6 and later give ragged splash and text rendering -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
