Howard: I really agree that the libnss-ldapd design is much cleaner and a better alternative in the long run (e.g., doing client certificates with libnss-ldap would be "interesting"). However, the documented way [1] of using ldap for authentication uses libnss-ldap, so this should be supported or the documentation needs to be changed. Besides, I think a lot of organizations would be hesitant to migrate to libnss-ldapd.
https://help.ubuntu.com/9.10/serverguide/C/openldap-server.html -- NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
