On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 12:04 +0000, Marc_Richter wrote:

> So, to come to one level here: Do you see my point with the
> no-realistic-workarround-available ? Don't be mad with me please, but
> I still don't see how to practically work with your "cancel when it
> happens" solution in remote sites. Could you please explain how your
> intention to use this was/is when you removed these triggers? I still
> think that it simply isn't practicable to cancel a fs check on a
> remote system at boot time. That would presuppose that everyone had a
> remote KVM on IP basis or have a ride to the ISP everytime you have to
> reboot :(
> 
Sure, that's a bit of a different use case to the usual one.

I reviewed the notes we made at the time (this is going back a while
now), and the assumption is that server users "tend" to turn off maximum
mount counts and the like with tune2fs

Don't forget, you can also use tune2fs before a reboot to delay or
cancel the next one.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
sc...@ubuntu.com

-- 
Please add option -f and -F to shutdown for LPIC compatibility
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535120
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to