i don't send them either, and i am also pissed of all of them, its too much.
2009/11/8 matthias <mansurdequen...@gmail.com> > i don't send them either, and i am also pissed of all of them, its too > much. > they fill up all my email account. > it is a stupid server only fulfilling what he was told, but seems to run > out > of control. > > 2009/11/7 Sebastian <svillarrea...@austin.rr.com> > > > LOOK MAN, I AM NOT SENDING ANY EMAILS, YOU ARE TTHE ONE SENDING THEM TO > ME. > > I DO NOT USE UBUNTU 9.10 ANY LONGER, IT WAS TOO DIFFICULT TO OPERATE. > CHECK > > WITH THE HEAD GUYS WHO RUN THE OP.PLATFORM. > > > > THANK, BEST REGARDS, > > > > S. > > timelab > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <oume...@gmail.com> > > To: <svillarrea...@austin.rr.com> > > Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 1:15 PM > > Subject: Re: [Bug 424965] Re: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in > > __getitem__() > > > > > > I want off these emails! Please do not send any more. > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:10 AM, Launchpad Bug Tracker < > > 424...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > > > > This bug was fixed in the package apport - 1.9.4-0ubuntu1 > > > > > > --------------- > > > apport (1.9.4-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low > > > > > > [ Marco Rodrigues ] > > > * etc/default/apport: Replace the old init.d force_start command by > > > the Upstart one. > > > * debian/apport.upstart: If $force_start=1 is given then run the job. > > > * debian/local/apport-collect: Don't collect information if bug is a > > > duplicate. (LP: #471429) > > > > > > [ Martin Pitt ] > > > * New upstream bug fix release: > > > - Fix crash when ExecutablePath isn't part of a package. (LP: > #424965) > > > - hookutils.py, attach_hardware(): Anonymize disk labels. Thanks to > > > Marco > > > Rodrigues. (LP: #394411) > > > - hookutils.py, attach_wifi(): Anonymize encryption key (which > > appeared > > > in > > > hex when being called as root). Thanks to Marco Rodrigues. (LP: > > > #446299) > > > - launchpad.py: If unset, set bug task source package also for > > > interpreter > > > crashes. > > > - apport-gtk: Give details window a minimize/maximize button, which > > > were > > > missing in some window managers. Thanks to Marien Zwart. (LP: > > > #447749) > > > - apport-kde: Properly terminate program after closing the last > > dialog. > > > (LP: #458662) > > > - hookutils.py, attach_alsa(): Attach /proc/asound/version. (LP: > > > #467233) > > > - general-hooks/generic.py: Only collect ~/.xsession-errors bits > when > > > we > > > have an ExecutablePath linked to libgtk. > > > * debian/control: Update Vcs-Bzr: for lucid branch. > > > * data/package-hooks/source_linux.py: Add interactive questionaire, > > > thanks > > > Leann Ogasawara! (LP: #444672) > > > -- Martin Pitt <martin.p...@ubuntu.com> Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:06:52 > > +0100 > > > > > > ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) > > > Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released > > > > > > -- > > > apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965 > > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > > of a duplicate bug. > > > > > > Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > > Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed > > > > > > Bug description: > > > SRU information: > > > -------------------------- > > > Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a > > > crash > > > against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug > > > trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and > > karmic, > > > and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst). > > > > > > Fix: > > > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629; > > > this does not magically cause the original crash report to be > > reportable, > > > but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport. > > > > > > Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() > > could > > > just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would > > > not > > > mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I > don't > > > see a real regression potential here. > > > > > > ProblemType: Crash > > > Architecture: i386 > > > Date: Sat Sep 5 21:22:30 2009 > > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 > > > ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > > > InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 > > > NonfreeKernelModules: wl > > > Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1 > > > PackageArchitecture: all > > > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > > > ProcEnviron: > > > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > > > SHELL=/bin/bash > > > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic > > > PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk'] > > > SourcePackage: apport > > > Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > > > Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686 > > > UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of a duplicate bug. > > > > Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed > > > > Bug description: > > SRU information: > > -------------------------- > > Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a > crash > > against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug > > trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and > karmic, > > and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst). > > > > Fix: > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629; > > this does not magically cause the original crash report to be > reportable, > > but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport. > > > > Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() > could > > just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would > not > > mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I don't > > see a real regression potential here. > > > > ProblemType: Crash > > Architecture: i386 > > Date: Sat Sep 5 21:22:30 2009 > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 > > ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > > InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 > > NonfreeKernelModules: wl > > Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1 > > PackageArchitecture: all > > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > > ProcEnviron: > > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > > SHELL=/bin/bash > > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic > > PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk'] > > SourcePackage: apport > > Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > > Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686 > > UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare > > > > -- > > apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965 > > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > > of a duplicate bug. > > > > Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > > Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed > > > > Bug description: > > SRU information: > > -------------------------- > > Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a > crash > > against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug > > trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and > karmic, > > and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst). > > > > Fix: > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629; > > this does not magically cause the original crash report to be > reportable, > > but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport. > > > > Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() > could > > just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would > not > > mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I don't > > see a real regression potential here. > > > > ProblemType: Crash > > Architecture: i386 > > Date: Sat Sep 5 21:22:30 2009 > > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 > > ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > > InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 > > NonfreeKernelModules: wl > > Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1 > > PackageArchitecture: all > > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > > ProcEnviron: > > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > > SHELL=/bin/bash > > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic > > PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk'] > > SourcePackage: apport > > Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > > Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686 > > UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare > > > > > > > > -- > apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of a duplicate bug. > > Status in “apport” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released > Status in “apport” source package in Karmic: Fix Committed > > Bug description: > SRU information: > -------------------------- > Impact: Causes unhandled exceptions in Apport when trying to report a crash > against a program which does not belong to a package any more. (See bug > trail for common examples: (1) file disappeared between jaunty and karmic, > and (2) program is a hardlink created in postinst). > > Fix: > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Eapport-hackers/apport/trunk/revision/1629 ; > this does not magically cause the original crash report to be reportable, > but gives a proper error message instead of just crashing Apport. > > Regression potential: Handling this situation in obsolete_packages() could > just cause a similar problem to appear in a later code path. This would not > mean a regression, since the crash is unreportable either way. So I don't > see a real regression potential here. > > ProblemType: Crash > Architecture: i386 > Date: Sat Sep 5 21:22:30 2009 > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 > ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.6 > NonfreeKernelModules: wl > Package: apport-gtk 1.8.2-0ubuntu1 > PackageArchitecture: all > ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk > ProcEnviron: > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > SHELL=/bin/bash > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-9.29-generic > PythonArgs: ['/usr/share/apport/apport-gtk'] > SourcePackage: apport > Title: apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() > Uname: Linux 2.6.31-9-generic i686 > UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare > > > -- Met vriendelijke groeten Pierre De Kegel bezoek ons op: http://www.no-os.biz Before printing, think about your responsibility and commitment with the Environment! Avant d'imprimer ce mail, voyez si cela est nécésaire, car il faut penser à l'environnement! voordat U deze mail uitprint, denk eerst na als dit nodig is, want men moet aan ons milieu denken! -- apport-gtk crashed with KeyError in __getitem__() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/424965 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
