The latest version of the bioinformatics template from 
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/bioinformatics/for_authors/submission_online.html
 does not require mathtime anymore (the lines are commented out).
So, just use the latest version of "upstream" when writing your bioinformatics 
documents and everything's fine.

I guess the original bug is somewhat solved (at least the part dealing
with mathtime), as the bioinformatics template does not require the
template anymore.

I tested to compile the test document provided (as in "I tried to
reproduce the bug with the latest version of the template and its test
document) and it worked.

So it is working "out of the box" again, if you use the latest bioinformatics 
template. So this problem is solved.
Still other documents using mathtime.sty need to be updated, but if I get the 
Debian bug report right, there are licensing issues with it and therefore 
upstream (texlive) decided not to include it anymore (or has never included it, 
just a workaround, I'm not really sure. However, now it does not work anymore 
and they broke it by intend). So /this/ problem is a wontfix, just fix your 
documents (hints in /usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/fonts/belleek/ and the debian 
bug).

-- 
[regression from tetex] missing fonts/packages in texlive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to